Partly allowed

Indarlal Jayramdas Makadiya and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC8 Nov 2016APPLN/6131/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed on original accused nos. 2 and 3 in Sessions Case No. 29 of 2012. The judge directed their release on bail by executing a personal bond and furnishing sureties while the criminal appeal is pending.

What did the court decide?

Suspended sentence; released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 15,000/- and sovereign sureties of like amount.

Indarlal Jayramdas Makadiya and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bombay HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

(1)Cri. Appln. No. 6131 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

¶3

Criminal Application No. 6131 of 2016 (In Criminal Appeal No. 670 of 2016)

¶4

District : Jalgaon

¶5

1. Indarlal Jayramdas Makadiya,
Age : 44 years,
Occupation : Beer Bar
And Hotel Shital,
R/o. Sindh Colony, Amalner,
Taluka : Amalner,
District : Jalgaon.
2.Mahesh Indarlal Makadiya,
Age : 21 years,
Occupation : Beer Bar
And Hotel Shital,
R/o. Sindh Colony, Amalner,
Taluka : Amalner,.. Applicants
District : Jalgaon. (Original accused)

¶6

versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra, Through the P.S.O., Amalner Police Station, Amalner, Taluka : Amalner, District : Jalgaon. .. Respondent. ............ Mr. Manish V. Bhamre, Advocate, for applicants. Mr. A.D. Namde, Addl. Public Prosecutor, for the respondent.

¶8

............

¶9

CORAM : A.M. BADAR, J. DATE : 08TH NOVEMBER 2016 [Diwali Vacation]

¶10

(2)Cri. Appln. No. 6131 of 2016

¶11

ORAL ORDER:

¶12

Heard.

¶13

2. Perused the impugned judgment.

¶14

3.Substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed
upon applicants / original accused nos.2 and 3 vide
judgment and order dated 14.10.2016, passed by the
Addl. Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No.
29 of 2012, for offence punishable under Section 324
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, is
suspended, pending hearing and final disposal of
Criminal Appeal No. 670 of 2016. Applicants /
original accused nos.2 and 3 are directed to be
released on bail, pending hearing and final disposal
of the appeal, on their executing P.R. Bond in the
sum of Rs. 15,000/- each and on furnishing one or
more solvent sureties of the like amount by each of
them.

¶15

4.The Application stands disposed of in the
above terms.

¶16

5.Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of
this order.

¶17

( A.M. BADAR )
 JUDGE
 [Vacation Court]

¶18

 puranik / CRIAPPLN6131.16

Indarlal Jayramdas Makadiya and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indarlal Jayramdas Makadiya and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanyakumari W/O. Arjun Vaychal Vs Nagesh S/O. Baban Tapare and Anr.

Ganesh S/O Kakasaheb Sable Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shivaji Sambhaji Parkad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sharif Shah Salim Shah Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar @ Ganesh Tukaram Yeole Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dattu Bapurao Madan and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra