Criminal application rejected by the High Court at Aurangabad as the charge-sheet had already been filed; however, the rejection does not preclude parties from seeking other appropriate legal remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3280 OF 2016
(Pramod s/o Balkrushna Kulkarni and others Vs. The State
of Maharashtra and another)
Mr. D.V. Tele, Advocate holding for Mr. P.N. Muley,
Advocate for the applicants
Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.P.P. for the respondent/State
Mr. M.R. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No. 2
CORAM :S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 26th September, 2016
PER COURT:
The learned A.P.P. informs this Court that the
charge-sheet is already filed. Since the charge-sheet
is filed, we are not inclined to entertain this
application. The criminal application stands rejected.
However, the rejection of this application shall not be
construed as an impediment to avail an appropriate
remedy as available in law.
npj/criapln3280-2016
Pramod s/o Balkrushna Kulkarni and others
The State of Maharashtra and another
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court