Criminal application filed by Santosh challenging the proceedings. The bench held that no prima facie case was made out based on the notes of evidence. The application was rejected with directions to the Sessions Court to prepare the paper book.
Application rejected; directions given to Sessions Court, Latur to prepare Paper Book.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 29-2780.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2780 OF 2016
Santosh s/o. Narayan Kukar
..Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
..Respondents
Mr.A.V.Indrale-Patil, Advocate for Applicant
Mr.D.R.Kale, APP for respondents
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2016
PER COURT :
Heard.
2.Perused the findings recorded by the
trial Court. In the light of the notes of
evidence, prima facie, in our opinion, no case is
made out. The application stands rejected.
3.Registry to send back the Record and
Proceedings to the Sessions Court, Latur
immediately.
2 29-2780.odt
4.UponreceivingtheRecordand
Proceedings, the Sessions Court, Latur to prepare
Paper Book and send it along with the Record and
Proceedings to this Court, as expeditiously as
possible and preferably, within four months from
the receipt of the Record and proceeding from the
registry of this Court.
[SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.][S.S. SHINDE, J.]
kbp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a prima facie case was made out in the application.
Santosh s/o. Narayan Kukar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court