The High Court at Bombay Bench, Aurangabad, dismissed Writ Petition No.6837 of 2014 as withdrawn by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6837.14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.6837 OF 2014
(Mangala Sharad Mutha & ors. vs. The Recovery Officer-1, Debt Recovery
Tribunal, Aurangabad & ors.)
OfficeNotes, Court’s or Judge’s Orders
Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances,
Court’s orders or
directionsand
Registrar’s orders.
Mr. D.K. Kulkarni Advocate for Petitioner.
....
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 30TH SEPTEMBER, 2016
ORDER:
. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner,
on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw
this Petition. The Writ Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[V.K. JADHAV, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/SEP16
Mangala Sharad Mutha & ors.
The Recovery Officer-1, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad & ors.
S.S. SHINDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court