Dismissed

Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Maheboob v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC22 Sept 2016APPLN/2370/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Appeal filed by a convict disputing the rejection of a bail application. The High Court observed that the Trial Court's findings were supported by evidence and held that no case for bail was made out, rejecting the application and rejecting the appeal for lack of substance.

What did the court decide?

The bail application is rejected. The Criminal Appeal is dismissed. The record is sent back to the Sessions Court Registry.

Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Maheboob Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

crap2370.16

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AURANGABAD

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2370 OF 2016 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 281 OF 2016

¶6

Shaikh Akbar s/o Shaikh
Memboob

¶7

...Applicant

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

The State of Maharashtra

¶10

...Respondent

¶11

.....

¶12

Shri Joydeep Chatterjee, advocate for the
applicant

¶13

Shri M.M.Nerlikar, A.P.P. for respondent

¶14

.....

¶15

 CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S.PATIL, JJ.

¶16

 DATED : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2016

¶17

PER COURT :

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the applicant

¶19

and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent/State.
Perused the findings recorded by the Trial Court.

¶20

2.Prima facie, it appears that the findings
recorded by the Court below are in consonance with
the evidence brought on record, in as much as the

¶21

Trial Court relied upon the evidence of three eye
witnesses coupled with the medical evidence.

¶22

2crap2370.16

¶23

Therefore, no case is made out for grant of bail.
The applicant was not on bail during trial.

¶24

Hence, the Application stands rejected.

¶25

3.The Registry to send back the original
record to the Registry of the Sessions Court,
Nanded. Upon receipt of the original record, the
concerned Registry to prepare the paper book and
send it along with the original record to the
Registry of this Court, as expeditiously as
possible, however, within three months from today.

¶26

4.After receipt of such paper book and
record, liberty to mention for early hearing of
the appeal.

¶27

dbm/crap2370.16

Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Maheboob v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Maheboob v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Azadsinh @ Shambhuraj S/O. Mohanrao Khalate and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ganpat S/O Shamrao Lokare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dr Sandeep S/O Manchakrao Malve and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

State of Maharashtra Vs Rajendrasingh Bhagwansingh Babri and Others

Krishna S/O Daulat Bansode Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Rajaram Shripati Banduke Vs the State of Maharashtra