Disposed
Gopal Fakirchand Patil v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCAPPLN/1651/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Cri.A-1651-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1651 OF 2016
Gopal Fakirchand Patil ...PETITIONERS
versus
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. V. P. Patil, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S. G. Karlekar, APP For Respondent State
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2016.
Order :-
Since charge-sheet is filed, without entering into merits of the matter, leaving open remedy filing application for discharge before the concerned court, we dispose of this application.
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.]
MTK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal application should be decided on merits when a charge-sheet has been filed.
Gopal Fakirchand Patil
The State of Maharashtra & anr.
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court