The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, allowed the Criminal Application to withdraw with liberty to file another application for discharge.
The application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file the application for discharge before the concerned Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3093.16appln
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3093 OF 2016
NANDKUMAR BALAJI SOITKAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
...
Advocate for applicants:Mr.M.R. Sonawane
APP for Respondent/State:Mr.S.Y. Mahajan
Advocate for respondt. no.2:Mr.A.S. Bayas
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & K.K.SONAWANE, JJ. Dated: November 15, 2016
The learned counsel appearing for the
applicants, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw this application
with further liberty to file the
application for discharge before the
concerned Court.
2.The application is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(K.K.SONAWANE, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
sga/
Nandkumar Balaji Soitkar
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court