This short order allows a criminal bail application. The court accepted prosecution witnesses' evidence as supported by medical findings but noted the trial court had not properly considered other evidence, leading to the grant of leave for bail.
Leave to remain on bail allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sr. no. 905 application.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 CRIMINAL APPLN/6715/2016
KISHAN S/O DADARAO PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Niteen V. Gaware APP for Respondents: Mr. D. R. Kale
. . .
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 15TH DECEMBER, 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Perused the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and in particularly, PW-4 Annasaheb Patil and also medical evidence. PW-4 is an injured witness who has named the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and also overt acts are attributed to them. Evidence of PW-4 gets support from the medical evidence. There is also other evidence on record which is not properly considered by the trial court. Therefore, case is established to allow the application seeking leave. According the application is allowed and disposed of.
[K.K.SONAWANE] JUDGE
[S.S. SHINDE] JUDGE
grt/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be allowed on the facts and law.
KISHAN S/O DADARAO PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
