The High Court at Bombay granted bail to an applicant convicted under sections 302 and 498A IPC. The court noted conflicting dying declarations and the applicant's pending status on bail during trial as factors favoring release.
Release on bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with one or two sureties; monthly reporting to police station.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
appa.92.2016_12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.489 OF 2014
Rahul Namdev Patil ... Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Hrishikesh Mundargi for the Applicant Ms.A.S. Pai, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JUNE 21, 2016
P.C.:
1 / 3
appa.92.2016_12.doc
the hospital, they do not state that Ashwini informed them that the applicant had set her on fire.
i) The applicant be released on bail in the sum of Rs.50,000/with one or two sureties to make up the said amount;
ii) During the period that the applicant is on bail, he will report to Shahuwadi police station, Kolhapur once in a month i.e., on the first Sunday of every month.
2 / 3
appa.92.2016_12.doc
7. The application is allowed on the above terms.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
3 / 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an applicant convicted under sections 302 and 498A IPC on the ground of conflicting dying declarations and lack of corroboration from parents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahul Namdev Patil
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
