Criminal application in criminal appeal was rejected as there was no urgency based on the hearing of learned counsel for both sides. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
appa808.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.808 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.65 OF 2016
State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Akot File, Akla District Akola
..vs..
Sheikh Mehmood Sheikh Mehboob and ors
....................................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's Order
Shri T.A. Mirza, Addll.P.P. for the Appellant/State. Shri S.K. Sable, counsel for Applicant/Respondent No.1.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA K. JAIN, JJ. DATED : DECEMBER 19, 2016.
This is an application for urgent hearing of the criminal appeal.
Heard learned counsel Shri S.K. Sable for applicant/respondent No.1 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri T.A. Mirza for the appellant/State.
As there is no urgency, the criminal application is rejected and disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE JUDGE
!! BRW !!
.....2/-
appa808.16
2
C E R T I F I C A T E
I certify that this Order/Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.
Uploaded by : Bhushan R.Wankhede. Uploaded on :- 19/12/2016 (Personal Assistant)
...../-
State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Akot File, Akla District Akola
Sheikh Mehmood Sheikh Mehboob and ors
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA K. JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
