High Court allowed 84-day delay condonation for State appeals against a conviction/acquittal. Appeals were postponed until orders on informants' leave applications were decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 appa244.15+1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.244 OF 2015
(STATE OF MAH. THR. ACP..VS..BANNASINGH @ RUPSINGH ATTARSINGH BAWRI & 2 OTH.) IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2015.
AND
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.245 OF 2015
(STATE OF MAH. THR. ACP..VS..BANNASINGH @ RUPSINGH ATTARSINGH BAWRI & 2 OTH.) IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2015.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri S.S.Doifode, A.P.P. for Applicant.
Shri A.V. Band, Advocate (appointed) for Respondent No.1. Shri P.K. Dahat, Advocate (appointed) for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATED : DECEMBER 16, 2016.
2 appa244.15+1
out that the informant and victim have filed their separate appeals challenging very same judgment and those appeals are within time.
JUDGE JUDGE
RRaut..
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 84 days in filing appeals against acquittal.
Whether the appeals are maintainable pending leave applications by informant and victim.
State of Mah. Thr. ACP.
Bannasingh @ Rupsingh Attarsingh Bawri
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Indira Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
