The Court declined to intervene in the extraordinary jurisdiction regarding an FIR and charge sheet, keeping rival contentions open and deciding to dispose proceedings without costs.
Proceedings disposed without costs; Court not inclined to intervene.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2012cwp982.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION (CWP) NO. 982 OF 2016
(Ranjitsingh s/o Ayazsingh Kochar & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra thr. PS, Jaripatka, Nagpur & Anr.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ. DECEMBER 20, 2016.
Heard Shri S.S. Paliwal, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri R.S. Nayak, learned APP for respondent No.1.
Challenging FIR filed in April 2015 and charge sheet tendered thereafter in July 2015, this Court has been approached on 18.12.2016.
We are not inclined to intervene in extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Keeping all rival contentions open and with liberty to the petitioner to take all necessary pleas at appropriate juncture, we dispose of the present proceedings. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
*GS.
Ranjitsingh s/o Ayazsingh Kochar & Ors.
State of Maharashtra thr. PS, Jaripatka, Nagpur & Anr.
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
