In criminal appeal arising from a murder conviction, the Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence and bail, holding that medical evidence and lack of explanation by the appellant prima facie revealed complicity in the crime.
Application for suspension of substantive sentence and bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2_appa_522_2016 in A_67_2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.522 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2015
Alauddin s/o. Islam Ansari
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
...
Mr. I.M. Khairdi for the Applicant. Mr. H.J. Dedia, APP for the Respondent -State.
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED: 25th APRIL, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J]:-
The Applicant/ accused No.1 who has been convicted and sentenced for offence under section 302 of the IPC, in Sessions Case No.660 of 2011 has sought suspension of substantive sentence of imprisonment and his enlargement on bail pending the decision of appeal.
Megha
1/3
2_appa_522_2016 in A_67_2015
Megha
2/3
2_appa_522_2016 in A_67_2015
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,J.) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Megha
3/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail and suspension of substantive sentence should be granted to the appellant convicted of murder who is appealing.
Whether the appellant's failure to explain the cause of the deceased's death warrants rejection of bail application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alauddin s/o. Islam Ansari
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja PrabhuDESSai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court