The applicant's counsel did not press the bail application, seeking instead expedited hearing of the appeal noting six years of custody; the court expedited the appeal and disposed of the application in those terms.
Expedited hearing of the appeal granted; bail application disposed without pressing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 3.crappa.501.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 501 OF 2016 IN
CRI. APPEAL NO. 1084 OF 2015
Javed Rehman Shaikh .. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Amin H. Solkar Advocate for Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 26, 2016
P.C.:
1 The learned counsel for the applicant states that he is not pressing the application for bail at this stage and looking to the fact that the applicant is in custody for almost six years, hearing of the appeal may be expedited. Looking to this fact, hearing of the appeal is expedited.
2 The application is disposed of in above terms.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
Javed Rehman Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
V.K.Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
