This order condones a 31-day delay in filing a Criminal Appeal (Special) contending that the delay was caused due to filing from jail. The application was allowed.
Delay of 31 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2a. cri appa 402-16.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 402 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 242 OF 2016
Dilip Digambar Chavan
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 1, 2016.
P.C.:
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 31
days caused in filing the appeal.
3. Looking to the fact that this application and the appeal
have been filed through jail and the other facts and
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
2a. cri appa 402-16.doc
circumstances of this case, in our opinion, in the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 31 days in filing an appeal filed from jail.
Dilip Digambar Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
