In this criminal application for condonation of delay, the High Court of Bombay condoned a delay of 58 days in filing an appeal, considering that the filing was made from jail, and allowed the application.
Condonation of delay of 58 days in filing the appeal; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1a. cri appa 242-16.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 242 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 152 OF 2016
Sachin Nandu Bhosale
.. Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan | Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant |
| Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 1, 2016.
P.C.:
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 58
days caused in filing the appeal.
3. Looking to the fact that this application and the appeal
have been filed through jail and the other facts and
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
1a. cri appa 242-16.doc
circumstances of this case, in our opinion, in the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly, delay is condoned.
[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
2 of 2
jfoanz vkacsjdj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay of 58 days in filing a criminal appeal, filed from jail, should be allowed in the interest of justice.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachin Nandu Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
