FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
The delay in complying with the judgment dated 28.08.2015 was satisfactorily explained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1503appa183.16
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 183 OF 2016 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 659 OF 2005
State of Maharashtra thr PSO Gittikhadan Nagpur VERSUS Vinod Damarkumar Shahi & Ano.
Shri S. M. Ghodeswar APP for the appellant/State. Shri Mirza counsel for the respondents.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI_AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : MARCH 15, 2016 .
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in complying with the judgment dated 28.08.2015 has been satisfactorily explained. The application is allowed.
JUDGE
JUDGE
svk
2 1503appa183.16
State of Maharashtra
Vinod Damarkumar Shahi
B. R. Gavai
A. S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
