The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a Criminal Application. Proceedings concerning atrocities under the SC/ST Act were stayed by an order of the same date, rendering the present application devoid of press.
Criminal Application No.126 of 2016 stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
ABA126-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Application (ABA) No. 126/2016 (Narendra Purushottam Jichkar and another .vs. State of Maharashtra through PSO, Sitabardi Police Station, Nagpur and another. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. A.S. Mardikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P.S. Wathore, Advocate for Applicants.
Mr. S.M. Ghodeswar, APP for Respondent No.1.
Mr. K.L. Satuja, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & A.S. Chandurkar, JJ. DATED : March 15, 2016.
Since by an order of even date we have already stayed the proceedings insofar as the offence under the provisions of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is concerned, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants does not press the application. Criminal Application (ABA) No.126 of 2016 stands disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narendra Purushottam Jichkar and another
State of Maharashtra through PSO, Sitabardi Police Station, Nagpur and another
B.R. Gavai
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
