The applicant, through counsel, stated an intention to withdraw the criminal application. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Withdrawal of application allowed; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 11.cri.appa.1556.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1556 OF 2014 IN
APPEAL NO. 1151 OF 2009
Mayur Mulji Parmar
.. Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Mr. Shirish Gupte Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Rahul Arote Advocate for Applicant
Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 16, 2016
P.C.:
1 The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the applicant states that he has instructions to withdraw this application. In view of the above statement, application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [ SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]
kandarkar
1 of 1
Mayur Mulji Parmar
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
