Latif Hasan Madari and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Application for bail by convicted applicants under section 302 IPC was rejected. The bench found medical evidence insignificant against the prosecution witness's version.
What did the court decide?
Bail application is rejected.
What the court decided
8.APPA1037_2016.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1037 OF 2016 (For Bail) IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1150 OF 2013
Latif Hasan Madari & Anr. ... Applicants Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mrs. A.M.Z. Ansari, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: AUGUST 31, 2016
P.C.:
- Heard both sides.
- The applicants have been convicted under section 302 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code for causing the death of Ranjita. The applicants are now seeking bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to applicants convicted under section 302 IPC for causing death of Ranjita.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Latif Hasan Madari & Anr.
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court