The Bombay High Court disposed of an appeal in arbitration proceedings by a consent order after the parties amicably settled their dispute and filed signed minutes of settlement.
Appeal disposed of per consent minutes; incidental applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APP. 723-14
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEALS No. 723 OF 2014 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No. 359 OF 2014
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 1207 OF 2016
WITH
CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) No. 1222 OF 2014
Mr. Mohammed Hanif … Appellant Versus The Sole Arbitrator, Shri. V. Inbavijayan … Respondent
Mr. Sayed Zia Amir Mohiddin, for the Appellant.
Mr. Sandesh Godse a/w Sharayu Pednekar i/b Vivek Patil & Associates a/w Sanjay Sonar, Authorised Representative of Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATED: AUGUST 29, 2016
PC:-
the consent terms / minutes of settlement. Consent minutes are taken on
APP. 723-14
record. They are signed by the Appellant and Respondent No. 2 and their respective advocates. Respondent No. 1 is an arbitrator. Respondent No. 3 has already been deleted from the array of parties. Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of consent minutes between the Appellant and Respondent No. 2.
Sd/Sd/[SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal arising from the arbitration proceedings should be disposed of in light of the parties reaching a settlement.
Mr. Mohammed Hanife
The Sole Arbitrator, Shri. V. Inbavijayan
V.M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
