The High Court of Bombay condoned a 62-day delay in filing an appeal and allowed and disposed of the Notice of Motion No. 2052 of 2015, placing the matter for stay on the admission board. The judgment is a one-order disposal with no substantive legal reasoning. Quality is thin.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(NMAL 2052 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 2052 OF 2015
IN APPEAL (L) No.805 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT No. 136 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION No. 181 OF 2015 WITH
APPEAL (L) No. 805 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT No. 136 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION No. 181 OF 2015
WITH NOTICE OF MOTION No. 2982 OF 2015 IN APPEAL (L) No. 805 OF 2015 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT No.136 OF 2015 IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION No. 181 OF 1990
Dr.Bakul Chandulal Mehta ….Applicant
In the matter between
Dr.Bakul Chandulal Mehta ….Appellant Vs. Yogesh C. Maniar and Anr ….Respondents
Mr.Sandeep Maurya for Applicant /Appellant Mr.Amit Tungare for Respondents ***********
1/2
(NMAL 2052 of 2015)
CORAM : V. M. KANADE
REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ
DATE : JANUARY 04, 2016
P.C. :
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Whether the Notice of Motion ought to be allowed and disposed of accordingly.
Dr. Bakul Chandulal Mehta
Yogesh C. Maniar and Another
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
