Appeal against an order in Arbitration Petition No. 924 of 2013 dismissing the challenge to an arbitral award. The appellants argued the sole arbitrator lacked jurisdiction due to lack of consent, but the Single Judge held their conduct barred this plea. The High Court granted no relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APP. 505-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL No. 505 OF 2016
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No. 924 OF 2013
Glasspaane Aluminium India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Appellants Vs. Reliance Capital Ltd. … Respondents
Mr. Jinal P. Gorasia i/b M/s. Consulta Juris, for the Appellants. Ms. Alpna Ghone a/w Ms. Shama Mulla i/b Ajay Miisar & Co., for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 1, 2016
PC.
It is submitted that the matter is likely to be settled and the matter may
be kept for filing of the consent terms in the last week of September, 2016. Similar statement was made on the last date i.e. 25th August, 2016 and the matter was kept today. Learned counsel appearing for
the Respondents, however submitted that no settlement has taken
1 / 3
APP. 505-16
place between the parties. She submitted that this submission is made after taking instructions from the Respondents. The learned counsel for the Appellants then submitted that the matter may be adjourned. We decline to grant adjournment since the matter is pending since last two years.
2 / 3
APP. 505-16
give their consent to the appointment of arbitrator, therefore, he had no jurisdiction to decide the dispute between the parties.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
3 / 3
Glasspaane Aluminium India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Reliance Capital Ltd.
V. M. Kanade
Smt. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
