Shilpi Aggarwal v. India Infoline Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
APP. 474-11
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL No. 474 OF 2011
Shilpi Aggarwal … Appellant Vs. India Infoline Ltd. … Respondents *** None for the Appellant. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 PC.
. None appears on behalf of the Appellant and the Respondents. We have perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge, in our view, has correctly held that the bye-laws of the National Stock Exchange have a statutory force and the period of limitation, prescribed by the said bye-laws will prevail. We are, therefore, concur with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. Appeal is, therefore, dismissed.
Sd/Sd/[Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shilpi Aggarwal
- respondent
India Infoline Ltd.
Coram
V. M. Kanade
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court