This appeal and associated arbitration petition were dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared, indicating a lack of keenness to pursue the matter.
Appeal dismissed; Notice of Motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APP. 426-15
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL No. 426 OF 2015
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION No. 65 OF 2015
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1298 OF 2015
Shamin Banu Modak
… Appellant
Vs.
Konkan Mercantile Co-Op. Bank Ltd. … Respondent
None for the Appellant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 30, 2016
PC.
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether appeal should be allowed given lack of prosecution by parties?
Shamin Banu Modak
Konkan Mercantile Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
V. M. Kanade
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
