The Bombay High Court declined to entertain a criminal application for quashing proceedings post-filing of the charge sheet, disposing of the application while keeping remedies and contentions open.
The criminal application was disposed of, with remedies and contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
apl-533-14
upk
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.533 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
None for the Applicants. Mrs.S.V.Sonawane, APP for the Respondent No.1. Mr.Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Respondent No.2. ...
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 28 SEPTEMBER 2016
P.C.:
. Learned Counsel appearing for the second Respondent states that charge sheet has been filed on 17 November 2014. We accept the said statement.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a criminal application for quashing proceedings even after the filing of the charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court