The High Court of Bombay dismissed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR because the Anticipatory Public Prosecutor advised non-entertainment due to the subsequent filing of the charge-sheet on 08.09.2016.
The petition for quashing of the FIR was dismissed; all contentions and remedies of the petitioners kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
41-Cri-WP-777-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 777 OF 2015
Mr. Nilesh Singh S/o. Prem Shankar Singh & …Petitioners Ors.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP the Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 27th September 2016
P.C. :
1. None appears for the Petitioners. The learned APP states
on instructions that on 8th September 2016, Charge-sheet has been
filed. Therefore, this Petition for quashing the First Information
Report need not be entertained.
3. All contentions and the remedies of the Petitioners are
expressly kept open.
[A.A. SAYED, J.] [A.S. OKA, J.]
Sharayu . 1 / 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing the First Information Report should be entertained in light of the filing of the charge-sheet.
Nilesh Singh
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
