Criminal Application No. 449 of 2016. Applicant sought to withdraw an application for quashing FIR by consent. Application dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
Application dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl449.16
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.449 OF 2016
Tipu Ramjan Shikalgar … Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Vijay Killedar for the Applicant. Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. M.N. Sandhyanshiv for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P.D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 18th APRIL, 2016
P.C.
. Not on board. Taken on board.
. The prayer in this application is for quashing the FIR by consent. After hearing the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and after considering the material on record, when this Court was of the view that this is not a fit case at all to exercise powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tipu Ramjan Shikalgar
The State of Maharashtra
Anr.
A.S. Oka
P.D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
