Applicant sought permission to withdraw the Criminal Application. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the Criminal Application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No. 268 of 2016 [Nivrutti Jaganji Uike Vs. State of Mah. & to others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. Rishikesh Mardikar, Adv., for the Applicant. Mr. T.A. Mirza, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND MRS. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, jj. DATE : 04th May, 2016
After hearing the learned Adv., for the applicant for quite some time, he seeks permission to withdraw this Application.
In the circumstances, Criminal Application [APL] No. 268/16 is dismissed as withdrawn.
Judge Judge
|hedau|
Nivrutti Jaganji Uike
State of Mah.
B. R. GAVAI
SWAPNA S. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
