Allowed

Pundlik S/O Gunwant Mamankar and Others (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Akot, Akola

Bombay HC2 May 2016APPA/275/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to applicants across three related criminal applications (APPA 275/2016, APPA 262/2016) and allowed an application for speaking to minutes (APPP 575/2016). Relying on parity with accused nos. 14-16, who could not be convicted under Section 302 IPC, bail was granted on the condition of furnishing respective sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with ₹15,000 surety each; PSP minutes allowed.

Pundlik S/O Gunwant Mamankar and Others (in Jail) Vs the… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

02.05.appa.275.16+

¶2

¶3

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 275/2016

¶4

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 462/2015 ( Pundlik s/o Gunwant Mamankar and 4 others vs. The State of Maharashtra vs. Pundlik Gunwant Mamankar and another )

¶6

¶7

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 262 /2016 IN

¶8

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 30/2016 (Sheshrao Pundlik Wasu vs. The State of Maharashtra and another )

¶9

¶10

CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPP) NO. 575/2016 IN APPA : 53/2016 IN CRI.APPEAL NO. 462/2015

¶11

( Pundlik s/o Gunwant Mamankar and others vs. The State of Maharashtra vs. Shrikrishna s/o Ramrao Mamankar and others )

¶12

.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders

¶13

.............................................................................................................................................. Mr. S.G.Joshi, Adv.for applicants in APPA 275/2016; APPP : 575/2016 & and Mr S.V. Sirpurkar, Advocates for applicant/s in APPA : 262/2016

¶14

T.A. Mirza, Addl.P.P. For respondent -State

¶15

CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &

¶16

Mrs. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 2^nd May, 2016

¶17

The above-referred Applications are for suspension of sentence of grant of bail during the pendency of the Appeals.

¶18

The applicants are accused nos. 1,2 and 4. By an order dated 16^th April 2016, while considering the Application of original accused nos.

¶19

02.05.appa.275.16+

¶20

¶21

14,15 and 16, we have found that the applicants therein prima facie could not be convicted for the offence punishable under section 302 IPC and, at the most, their conviction could be for the offence punishable under section 307 IPC.

¶22

Perusal of the material placed on record would reveal that the material which is against the present applicants is the same as is against the accused nos.14,15 and 16. In that view of the matter on the ground of parity, both the Applications deserve to be allowed. The applicants namely (1) Pundlik s/o Gunwant Mamankar ; (2) Rajesh (Rajendra ) s/o Pralhad Mamankar in APPA : 275/2016 ; and applicant Sheshrao Pundlik Wasu in APPA No. 262/2016 are directed to be released on bail, on their furnishing surety in the sum of Rs. 15,000/(fifteen thousand) each, with one or more sureties in the like amount.

¶23

Both the Applications are allowed accordingly.

¶24

CRI(APPP) NO. 575/2016 IN APPA:53/2016 IN CRI.APPEAL NO.462/2015

¶25

For the reasons stated in the Application, the Application for speaking to minutes is allowed. The order be corrected accordingly.

¶26

JUDGEJUDGE

¶27

sahare

¶28

02.05.appa.275.16+

¶29

Pundlik S/O Gunwant Mamankar and Others (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Akot, Akola

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pundlik S/O Gunwant Mamankar and Others (in Jail) v. the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Akot, Akola

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Wasudeo Laxman Sawalkhe Vs the State of Mah, Thr Collector, Yavatmal and 2 Others

Rajendra Laxman Sawalakhe Vs the Executive Engineer Bembla Project Division, Yavamal and 2 Others

Courts on Its Own Motion Vs State of Maharashtra, Dept. of Urban Development, Mumbai through Its Secretary and Others

Gaffur S/O Latif Patel (in Jail) Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Home Department, Mumbai and Others

Sheshrao Pundlik Wasu (in Jail) Vs the State of Maharashtra, through P.S.O. P.S. Akot, Akola

Rajesh S/O Narayanrao Digade Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. P.S. Dhanaj, Washim