Application filed by Dr. Bharti Sonawane was disposed of on the ground that as a charge sheet was filed during the pendency, the applicant had an alternative remedy before the appropriate court. All contentions were kept open.
Application disposed of noting availability of alternative remedy; contentions kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
apl-162.14.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.162 OF 2014
Dr. Bharti Sonawane … Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Ms. Swapna P. Kode for the Applicant. Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2016
P.C.
. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant on instructions states that during the pendency of this application, charge sheet has been filed against the Applicant. Hence, the applicant has a remedy available before the appropriate Court. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. All remedies and contentions of the Applicant are expressly kept open.
1 of 1
Dr. Bharti Sonawane
State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
