This criminal appeal was found infructuous because a previous appeal by the same appellants (Criminal Appeal No.798/02) was allowed, quashing the judgment of conviction and acquitting the appellants. The court disposed of the current appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-APEAL-644-02.odt
1 / 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.644 OF 2002
Satyendrakumar Lalit Kumar Shukla and another
.... Appellants
versus
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Ms. N.S. Bobade, advocate i/b. Manoj Bhatt, advocate for appellants. Mr.P.H. Gaikwad Patil, APP for the State/respondent. Ms. Yogita Deshmukh, advocate appointed at the cost of State.
CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J. DATE : 17th NOVEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
Bhatt, for appellants submits that appellants in this appeal have challenged the judgment and order of conviction of appellants passed on 29/05/2002 in Sessions Case No.314/01. The learned counsel further states that in fact without knowledge of the learned counsel for the appellants, present appellants have preferred another appeal challenging very same judgment and that Criminal Appeal bearing No.798/02 is allowed by this Court on
Nesarikar
2 / 3 903-APEAL-644-02.odt
29/10/2004 thereby quashing and setting aside the impugned judgment and order of conviction recorded by the learned II AdHoc A.S.J, Thane, dated 29/05/2002. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for appellants submitted that she does not want to press the instant appeal as the same is rendered infructuous.
Nesarikar
3 / 3 903-APEAL-644-02.odt
order of this Court dated 20/10/2004. In view of this matter, the Criminal Appeal No.644/02 is rendered infructuous and the same is disposed of.
(A.M. BADAR, J.)
Nesarikar
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Criminal Appeal bearing No.798/02Referred¶1
Satyendrakumar Lalit Kumar Shukla and another
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
