Dismissed

Tukaram Devaram Gawade v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Nov 2016APPA/296/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order in criminal appeal regarding a rape case. The court rejected the appellant's bail application due to the grave nature of the offence. Interest parties consented to dispense with the paper book and listed the appeal for final.

What did the court decide?

Application for suspension of sentence and release on bail rejected. Paper book dispensed with and appeal listed for final hearing.

Tukaram Devaram Gawade Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

(8)APPA-296-16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE

¶4

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.296 OF 2016 IN

¶5

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.201 OF 2016

¶6

Tukaram Devaram Gawade ... Appellant/Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent

¶7

Smt.Sonia S. Miskin, Appointed Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent/State.

¶8

CORAM : A. M. BADAR J.

¶9

DATED : 16^th NOVEMBER 2016.

¶10

P.C.

¶11

1 This is an application by the appellant for suspension of sentence and releasing him on bail during pendency of trial.

¶12

2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. He vehemently argued that there is unexplained delay in lodging the FIR and even the medical evidence does not support the prosecution case and no injury was found on person of the alleged victim of the crime in question. The learned counsel further argued that even the appellant is a young boy of about 21 years of age and, therefore, his detention in prison during the pendency of appeal is not warranted. In the alternative, the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant submitted that as Record and Proceedings is received by this Court, and as the

1/2

Gaikwad RD

(8)APPA-296-16

appeal involves examination of evidence of only few witnesses, hearing of the appeal may be expedited by dispensing with the paper book.

¶17

3 The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the application by contending that the crime in question is serious and the applicant/accused was under-trial prisoner even during pendency of trial.

¶18

4 I have considered the rival submissions and perused the evidence of the alleged victim of the crime in question. She is reported to be 13 years old female child. As per her version, the applicant/accused had committed rape on her. During her medical examination, her hymen was found to be perforated. Considering the nature of offence and the fact that the applicant/accused was undertrial prisoner during pendency of trial, as well as the fact that the learned counsel for the applicant/applicant in the alternative prayed for expeditious hearing of the appeal, the following order.

¶19

(i) The application for suspension of sentence and releasing the applicant on bail is rejected.

¶20

(ii) By consent of parties, paper book is dispensed with.

¶21

(iii) By consent of parties, the appeal be put up for final hearing with Record and Proceedings on 1^st December 2016 .

¶22

2/2

¶23

Gaikwad RD

Tukaram Devaram Gawade v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tukaram Devaram Gawade v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Kamlakar Baravkar Vs Central Bureau Investigation and Anr.

Mahipati Sripati Bharam Vs Akshada /Rani Santosh Bharam and Ors.

Prakash Manohar Kasar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nandkishore Alias Bhimkumar Bhajuman Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shankarayya Kankayya Dasari Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Balasaheb @ Pratap Sadashiv Yadav