In Criminal Application No.131 of 2015, the High Court of Bombay granted leave to appeal, admitted the criminal application, directed the call for the record and proceedings in an case where the respondent had been acquitted of corruption charges, with the respondent waiving notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-ALS-131-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.131 OF 2015
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPLICANT
V/s.
SADHASHIV PRABHAKAR KULKARNI )...RESPONDENT
Shri S.V.Gavand, APP for the Applicant – State.
Mr.V.S.Talkute, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : A. M. BADAR DATE : 15th NOVEMBER 2016.
P.C. :
1 Heard learned APP as well as learned counsel for the respondent / accused. Perused the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Special court, Malshiras, acquitting the respondent of the offence punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Leave granted.
Admit.
Call for Record and Proceedings.
Learned counsel Mr.V.S.Talkute waives notice for respondent.
(A. M. BADAR, J.)
avk 1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the special court was justified in acquitting the respondent of offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The State of Maharashtra
Sadashiv Prabhakkar Kulkarni
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
