The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Suit No. 546 of 2012, allowed the withdrawal of the suit instituted by Mega Bollywood Private Limited and disposed of connected interim applications.
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn. All interim orders were vacated and connected interim applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904-S546-12+.DOC
ATUL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 546 OF 2012
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2726 OF 2016
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 625 OF 2012
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1159 OF 2016
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1177 OF 2016
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2815 OF 2016
Mega Bollywood Private Limited…Plaintiffs
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Others…Defendants
And
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited & Anr....Applicants
Mr. Jayesh Gopal Gawde, for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Rajiv Shah, Director of the Plaintiff Company, is present.
Smt. Jyoti Chavan, AGP, for Defendant No. 1.
Mr. Satyaprakash Sharma, for Defendant No. 7.
Mr. Kunal Chheda, i/b M.V. Kini & Co., for Respondent No. 13.
Mr. Ankit Lohia, with Mr. Sumit Raghani, i/b Agrud Partners, for
Respondent No. 1/Proposed Defendant No. 14.
Page 1 of 2
19th October 2016
904-S546-12+.DOC
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 19th October 2016
PC:-
1.On instructions from Mr. Rajiv Shah, Director of the Plaintiff,
who is present in Court, Mr. Gawde seeks to withdraw the Suit. The
Suit is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. Refund of court fee in accordance with the Rules.
3.All interim/ad-interim order stands vacated forthwith and all
respective interim applications being infructuous are disposed of
accordingly.
4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
19th October 2016
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court