On consent terms signed by advocates and parties, a decree on admission was passed and the suit in suit no. 411 of 2015 was disposed of by the Bombay High Court.
Decree on admission in terms of the consent terms; disposal of the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-S411-15.DOC
SHEPHALI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 411 OF 2015
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.…Plaintiff
Versus
Lyra Laboratories (P) Ltd. & Anr.…Defendants
Ms. Miloni Gala, i/b Mr. Mahesh Mahadgut, for the Plaintiff.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 5th May 2016
PC:-
1.Consent Terms are signed by the Advocates of both sides as
also by the parties’ authorised signatories. The Consent Terms
provide for a decree on admission in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b)
and (c), which are extracted in the Consent Terms. I am satisfied
that the Consent Terms reflect the true and correct intention of the
parties; have been drawn without fraud, force and coercion; and are
not contrary to law. The Consent Terms are taken on record and
marked “X” for identification. Undertakings in the Consent Terms
are accepted as undertakings to the Court.
2.The Suit is decreed and disposed of in accordance with the
Consent Terms. Refund of Court fee, if any, in accordance with the
Rules.
Page 1 of 2
5th May 2016
908-S411-15.DOC
3. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
5th May 2016
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court