The court observed that the entire cause of action for the writ petition arose in Mumbai, dictating that the petition should have been filed on the Original Side.
Directed transfer of the writ petition to the Original Side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9670
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9670 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.K.G.Rikame i/b Sagar Talekar for the Petitioner
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.K.MENON,JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2015.
P.C.
1Entire cause of action for filing
this petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India has arisen in
Mumbai. Therefore, this petition ought
to have been filed on the Original
Side.
2We direct the registry to transfer
this petition to the Original Side.
Consequential amendment shall be
carried out by the petitioner within a
period of three weeks from today.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 226 ought to be transferred to the Original Side as the entire cause of action arose in Mumbai.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State
A.S.Oka
A.K.Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court