Contempt petition filed for non-compliance with an order regarding an interim relief application was disposed of as the breach was found to be substantially complied with by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp88
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.88 OF 2014
Kisanrao Dhavji Rathod ...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
...Respondents
None for the petitioner
Mr.A.I.Patel, AGP for the respondent No.1
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.K.MENON, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2015
P.C.:
1None appears for the petitioner. The breach
alleged is of the order dated 18th March 2013 passed
by this Court. By the said order, the Appellate
Authority was directed to decide the application for
interim relief in the pending appeal. The learned
AGP has tendered across the bar a copy of the order
dated 13thMay 2013 passed by the Additional
Collector. By the said order, the appeal preferred
by the petitioner has been allowed and the matter
has been remanded to the Sub Divisional Officer.
2Thus, there is a substantial compliance made by
the concerned respondents. Hence, it is not
necessary to entertain this petition. Accordingly,
the Contempt petition is disposed of.
Kisanrao Dhavji Rathod
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court