The High Court Bench examined Criminal Writ Petition No. 946 of 2015 filed by a pensioner challenging an investigation. The court found the investigation properly conducted, held no case was made out to entertain the petition, and rejected it sans merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) Cri. W.P. No. 946 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 946 of 2015
Kusum @ Kapsabai w/o. Dadarao Khandagale, Age : 63 years, Occupation : Pensioner, R/o. Jaihind Nagari, Pisadevi Road, Aurangabad, at present C/o. Jijabai Sakhahari, Dehade in front of Dr. Barale's Hospital, Paithan Road, Kanchanwadi, Aurangabad, Taluka & District : Aurangabad.
.. Petitioner.
versus
(2) Cri. W.P. No. 946 of 2015
Mr. Govind G. Suryawanshi, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 25TH AUGUST 2015
PER COURT :
( A.M. BADAR ) ( S.S. SHINDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
puranik / CRIWP946.15
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the investigation conducted in the case was proper and sufficient to warrant setting it aside.
Whether the High Court should entertain the Criminal Writ Petition seeking inquiry/relief.
Whether the petition is sustainable without merits considering the investigation undertaken.
Kusum @ Kapsabai w/o. Dadarao Khandagale
The State of Maharashtra
Prashant s/o. Bhaurao Khillare
Rajendra s/o. Pandurang Kale
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
