Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a criminal writ petition stating the trial court had begun recording evidence. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
396.14crwp
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 396 OF 2014
PUNJAB MANIKRAO SAWANT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Shyam M.kalyankar APP for Respondents: Mr.K.M. Suryawanshi.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: AUGUST 24, 2015
Not on Board, taken on Board.
2 Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition in view of the fact that the trial Court has started recording evidence.
3 Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(A.M.BADAR, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
Punjab Manikrao Sawant
The State of Maharashtra
A.M. Badar
S.S. Shinde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
