The writ petition and connected civil application were allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty to file a similar petition. The matters were finally disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp906.15
2
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.906 OF 2015 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3433 OF 2015
(Jayant Bhaidas Shrirsath Vs The State of Maharashtra and Another)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda |
Court's or |
Judge's orders |
|---|---|---|
of Coram,appearances, Court's |
||
orders or directions and |
CORAM : |
A.V. NIRGUDE & |
Registrar's orders |
V.K. JADHAV, JJ. |
|
DATED : |
24.08.2015 |
Mr.Sandesh R. Patil, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr.D.B.Bhange, AGP for the respondent
No.1.
Mr.V.D.Gunale,Advocateforthe
respondent No.2.
1.The writ petition is allowed
to be withdrawn. Liberty is granted to
file similar petition before this
Court, if need arises.
2.In view of this the writ
petition is disposed of accordingly.
2 wp906.15
3.In view of dismissal of this
writ petition the connected civil
application does not survive and
disposed of.
[V.K. JADHAV, J.]
[A.V. NIRGUDE, J.]
VishalK/wp906.15
Jayant Bhaidas Shrirsath
The State of Maharashtra
The State of Maharashtra
A.V. NIRGUDE
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court