A single-line order dismissing a contempt petition where the court decided not to initiate action against the Collector despite a delay in passing the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 300 OF 2015
Chandrakant s/o Baburao Adsule
Petitioner
V E R S U S
Pandurang Pole
Respondent
Mr. T.M. Venjane, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. K.G. Patil, AGP for the respondent
CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE &
V. K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 24th August, 2015
PER COURT :-
There is delay in passing of the order. But,
we are not inclined to start any action against the
Collector. In view of this, petition stands dismissed.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. )
SRM/24/8/15
Chandrakant s/o Baburao Adsule
Pandurang Pole
A. V. NIRGUDE
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court