such date of publication of corrigendum, declaration issued under section 6 on 17.8.2013 shall have to be treated to be within prescribed period of limitation. The argument advanced by respondents deserves to be rejected for more than one reason. On perusal of the notification published in the official gazette on 7/13.3.2013, it is noticed that the corrigendum issued is in respect of section 6 declaration and said publication is not referable to section 4 notification. Even if assuming that reference to section 6 declaration in the notification is a typographical error, still the respondents cannot be permitted to contend that the corrigendum would save the limitation. The corrigendum is issued for correcting the contents of section 4 notification which shall relate back to the date of publication of notification. The petitioner placing reliance on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of Mohan and another Vs. State of Maharashtra and others, reported in (2007) 9 SCC page 431 contends that, the corrigendum issued to section 4 notification is referable to date of publication of section 4 notification. It is to be noted that, in view of section 6 (1) explanation 1, the period during which any action or proceeding to be taken in pursuance to the notification issued under section 4, subsection (1) remains stayed by an order of the Court is only
