In a brief order, this High Court dismissed a criminal writ petition as infructuous based on subsequent events occurring after the petition's filing, with no further reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGBAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2015
DNYANESHWAR MURLIDHAR PAWAR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Jadhavar Santosh S. APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. S.G. Chincholkar
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: February 04, 2015
PER COURT :-
Heard.
( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
DNYANESHWAR MURLIDHAR PAWAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
