Criminal applicants sought permission to withdraw a criminal application with future remedy if a chargesheet was filed; the High Court granted the withdrawal.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate remedy if chargesheet is filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGBAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2014
KIRAN @ DATTATRAYA SHIVSAMBH SONTAKKE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Rathi Swapnil S. APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. Katneshwarkar P.R.
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: February 04, 2015
PER COURT :-
The learned counsel appearing for the applicants, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to take appropriate remedy in the event of filing the chargesheet by the Investigating Officer.
as prayed.
( A.M. BADAR, J. )
( S.S. SHINDE, J. )
sga/-
Kiran @ Dattatraya Shivsambh Sontakke and Others
The State of Maharashtra
Anr
S.S. Shinde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
