Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the petition as withdrawn but noted the petitioner's right to challenge the impugned order in future.
Permission to withdraw the petition was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp8883
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8883 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.S.R.Kulkarni for the Petitioner
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 3, 2015.
P.C.
.Not on board. Taken on board.
1On instructions of the petitioner,
the learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the
petition. Accordingly, petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
2Wemakeitclearthat
notwithstanding the withdrawal of the
petition, it will be open for the
petitioner to challenge the order
dated 28th August 2015 in accordance
with law.
Unspecified Petitioner
Unspecified Respondents
A.S.Oka
V.L.Achliya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court