The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 1544 of 2000 (along with connected proceedings) for non-prosecution, discharged the rule, and vacated any interim order without costs.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; rule discharged with no order as to costs; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1544.00
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1544 OF 2000 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.22 OF 2002 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.131 OF 2004
Tata Hsg. Development Co. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Avinash Ram Belge i/b Aditya Chitale, for the Petitioners. Mrs. Geeta Jogalekar, for the Respondent - BMC.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ.
P.C.
. It is pointed out that the Petitioners have taken back the papers of the Petition from the Advocate for the Petitioners. The Petition is of the year 2000. It appears that the Petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the Petition. Accordingly, we dismiss the Petition for nonprosecution. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. Chamber Summons No.22 of 2002 and Notice of Motion No.131 of 2004 do not survive and the same are disposed of. If any interim order is operative, the same stands vacated.
1 of 2
2
wp-1544.00
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed
Judgment/order.
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tata Hsg. Development Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.
A.S. OKA
V.L. ACHLIYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
