Petitioner challenged 2007 Municipal Council election. Court held relief would lapse as new body elected subsequently, thus disposed of writ petition by discharging the rule.
Rule discharged. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP121.08
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2008
Ashraf Khan Taslimkhan .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents
Shri P. S. Pawar, Advocate for the Petitioner Smt. M. S. Patni, A. G. P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND
A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 18TH MARCH, 2015.
PER COURT :
The petitioner assails the election of the respondent Municipal Council conducted in the year, 2007. With the passage of time the relief claimed would not survive as new body would have been elected. In light of that, writ petition is disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs.
[ A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
sam/March. 15
Ashraf Khan Taslimkhan
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
