The Bombay High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation for transfer to a Zilla Parishad School within two months, considering his status as a handicapped person, and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to decide transfer representation within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-wp8150.15.sxw
ssm 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 8150 OF 2015
Suresh Sadashiv Beldar
….Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….Respondents.
Mr. V.S. Tadke I/by Mr. B.S. Shinde for the Petitioner. Mr. C.P. Yadav, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND
A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 23 SEPTEMBER 2015.
ORDER:-
We are inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition by directing Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to decide the representation filed by the Petitioner for transferring the Petitioner in any Zilla Parishad School of Mokhada Taluka in view of the Government Resolution dated 15 December 2004, being handicapped person.
2 It is made clear that the concerned Respondents to decide the said representation, as early as possible, preferably within two months from today.
3 Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of, with liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.
(A.A. SAYED, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
1/2
18-wp8150.15.sxw
ssm 2
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the Original signed
Judgment/Order.
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation for transfer of a handicapped person to a Zilla Parishad School should be decided.
Suresh Sadashiv Beldar
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Anoop V. Mota
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
