The Bombay High Court permitted applicants to amend the civil application and served respondent No. 2 via newspaper publication. The application was disposed of with no costs.
Leave to amend granted; service by publication permitted; application disposed of, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32.caf.2918.14.doc
upi 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2918 OF 2014
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 284 OF 2010
Mrs.Krupa Rakesh Rege and others .... Applicants In the matter between Mrs.Krupa Rakesh Rege and others … Appellants vs Rajaram Ganpat Garade and others .... Respondents
Mr.Rajesh S.Datar,for the Applicants. Mr.Misar, for Respondent No.3 in FA/284/10.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A. A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : September 22, 2015
ORDER:
. Leave to amend is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
1/3
32.caf.2918.14.doc
upi 2
take steps accordingly.
2/3
32.caf.2918.14.doc
upi 3
CERTIFICATE
Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgement/Order.
3/3
Mrs. Krupa Rakesh Rege and others
Rajaram Ganpat Garade and others
Anoop V. Mota
A. A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
